Above all Pakistan directly or indirectly gave sensual excitement and instigation to terrorism and it is this terrorism of Pakistan which is eating the leaders of Pakistan.Blaise Pascal says that men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. thus it is political murder/death and there may be series of murders in near future,nothing to wonder,be sure of it.
In Pakistan there is no fight against Dictator Musharraf but there is in fight among politicians hence such episodes are likely to occur in future also.
It hardly matters for Pakistan whether Benazir died of suicidal , homicidal or accidental death. For them it is a routine thing and no body feels sorry for it. That is why evidence from the spot was descreened and evidence was caused to be disappeared with intention of screening the offender from legal punishment. This is nothing but conspiracy of the govt. of Pakistan.
It may be Liyakat Ali Khan .Jiyaul Haque or Benazir nothing outcome came before public. It may be Julfikarali Bhutto or Saddam Hussein of Iraq they were actually killed in the name of legal process. It is America which has given shelter to Pakistan for terrorism and it is Pakistan which is blackmailing America in the name of nuclear weapons and America has completely bowed to Pakistan.
A nation cannot leave and run in the name of religion which Muslims ,Christians and Hindus should remember. In the name of religion it is all happening.Mind that religion is most secondary thing for nation and it is exclusively personal matter. Nation should be first and religion second for any one. It is rightly said by A.N. Whitehead that religion is the last refuge of human savagery. The assassination of Indira Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi was clear cut result of the action of the extremists and fundamentalists.
Due to treating religion as superior to the national interest Pakistan has failed to progress either in religion or in the development of the country. By treating religion above all what has happened is it has developed only terrorists and extremists and the power is vested in them. They think that they hold the crusader of religion.
What you think India is a good destination for Tourism?
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Murder of Benazir Bhutto
Posted by er.arpit at 7:31 AM 0 comments
Welcome to India
let's travel India......
wana see jaipur....
http://www.travelblog.org/Asia/India/Jaipur/
for all other city go on now....
http://www.travelblog.org/Asia/India/blogs-page-1.html
plz give ur feed back about the blog.... :-)
Posted by er.arpit at 7:27 AM 0 comments
Middle class society
The indian society is financially devided into five levels. They are upper class, upper middle class, middle class, lower middle class, and lower class.The lower class people are genarally poor people with no guarantee of earning two squre meals a day. Daily empolyment is a compulsion for them for survival and these people are the favorite pray for money lenders for earning a fast buck. The lower middle class people are with fixed incomes of lower level but always prefer to lead a decent life without exposing their poor financial status.The middle class people are earning sufficient income to meet their financial obligations and prefer to plan for the future.The upper middle class is surviving high disposable incomes.About upper class no discussion is nessacery because their life always revolves around money. The middle class always always prefer a closely knit family and a peaceful society. The middle class genarally consists of approaxmately 40-50 percent in the society. Majority of these people genarally go for voting in the genaral elections since the voting also is criminalised.Whenever these people go for voting it will give a decisive and positive verdict.
Posted by er.arpit at 7:26 AM 0 comments
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Eco-tourism in India
Growth of Eco-tourism in India and how this segment of concept-tourism can take its roots throughout India by conscious efforts of holidaymakers: a brief overview.
Eco tourism is growing in popularity and practice everywhere in the conscious world and India too, is making efforts for this concept-tourism to catch on by educating in-bound tourists and citizens about civic responsibility coupled with scientific findings that could lead to a better living environment for human, animal and plant species and a more beautiful, incredible India!
Sowing the seeds of social and ecological awareness: growth of eco-tourism in India
It began with raising awareness about local culture, wilderness adventure tour packages that raised consciousness about how to conduct lives in the lap of nature; then spread to actively volunteering time, money and physical efforts to protect and preserve Indian natural reserves and now there is a high degree of commitment from foreign and local tourists, due to personal growth and learning new ways to live on the planet. Thus, what began as a movement has now become nothing short of a celebration of life and India too is embracing the advantages of promoting the cause of Eco-tourism: traveling to destinations where the flora, fauna, and cultural heritage are the primary attractions!
Eco tourism in India has grown with the seeds of responsible tourism being sown by educating tourists through programs that talk about how to minimize the adverse effects of traditional tourism on the natural environment. A lot of credit for the growth of eco tourism in India goes to the united efforts of media initiatives, private travel agency contributions, coupled with NGO efforts and governmental eco-tourism awareness programs about eco-tourism etiquette when in India!
Posted by er.arpit at 7:05 AM 1 comments
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Is My vote important
In democratic nations, every eligible citizen is afforded one vote. What we do with that vote is entirely up to us, but armed with the knowledge that it is ours to do as we will, many of us tend to take this right seriously. There are those who think that their measly vote can't bring about any change, but I ask you: If we go to fight a war as an individual, sure, we probably won't make any difference, but when combined with others we form an army far stronger and more capable of making a difference, right?
It is with this knowledge that I was surprisingly offended when I heard a representative of a major presidential candidate rationalizing their defeat by saying that the voters assumed a victory and therefore chose to vote for another candidate who wouldn't normally get their vote, as sort of a sympathy vote. One can indeed make that arguement, and rationally convince a few that sympathy votes were cast by voters who would have otherwise voted for another candidate. The problem with this rationale is that during any early primary elections being held in any important state, such as New Hampshire, voters tend to speak their mind. With margins that are proving over and over again to be way too close, what makes you think that a voter would actually vote sympathetically for another candidate while pinning their hopes on the rest of the voters to bring their favorite candidate to victory? Many of us aren't idiots and even more aren't capable of thinking that deeply into the 'art of political war' that they would cast their vote in another direction because they knew their candidate was going to win.
A win is a win, and a loss is a loss. Don't be a sore loser, or a snubby winner. The people have spoken once again, and there is no reason to make any excuses as to your loss.
Posted by er.arpit at 7:43 AM 1 comments